Malpractice, corruption and judgements of professional ethics

Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 1 (1):115-146 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I discuss the use of legal methods to form ethical judgements in the professional field. In particular, I try to show the disadvantages of using the legal method of malpractice for this purpose. I introduce the moral concept of professional corruption because it enables us to understand the differences of theses two ways –the legal and the ethical- of approaching professional misconduct, and avoids the drawbacks of mixing these two viewpoints.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response—Corruption, Trust, and Professional Regulation.Kathleen Montgomery - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):129-134.
Professional Norms.Wade Robison - 2016 - Teaching Ethics 16 (2):185-194.
Professional Norms.Wade Robison - 2016 - Teaching Ethics 16 (2):185-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
9 (#1,528,202)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Ground of Professional Ethics.Daryl Koehn - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Legal and moral obligation.H. L. A. Hart - 1958 - In Abraham Irving Melden (ed.), Essays in moral philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
The concepts of obligation and duty.R. B. Brandt - 1964 - Mind 73 (291):374-393.
Noble cause corruption in politics.Seumas Miller - 2007 - In Igor Primoratz (ed.), Politics and morality. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Add more references