Knowledge and Other Norms for Assertion, Action, and Belief: A Teleological Account

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (3):681-705 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here I advance a unified account of the structure of the epistemic normativity of assertion, action, and belief. According to my Teleological Account, all of these are epistemically successful just in case they fulfill the primary aim of knowledgeability, an aim which in turn generates a host of secondary epistemic norms. The central features of the Teleological Account are these: it is compact in its reliance on a single central explanatory posit, knowledge-centered in its insistence that knowledge sets the fundamental epistemic norm, and yet fiercely pluralistic in its acknowledgment of the legitimacy and value of a rich range of epistemic norms distinct from knowledge. Largely in virtue of this pluralist character, I argue, the Teleological Account is far superior to extant knowledge-centered accounts

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Intellectual Flourishing as the Fundamental Epistemic Norm.Berit Brogaard - 2013 - In Clayton Littlejohn & John Turri (eds.), Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 11-31.
Moore's paradox and epistemic norms.Clayton Littlejohn - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):79 – 100.
You gotta believe.John Turri - 2013 - In Clayton Littlejohn & John Turri (eds.), Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 193-199.
Norms of assertion.Matthew Weiner - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):187–195.
Knowledge Norms.Matthew A. Benton - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:nn-nn.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-14

Downloads
1,153 (#16,394)

6 months
118 (#48,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Mehta
Yale-NUS College