All the King's horses and all the King's men: Justifying higher education

Journal of Philosophy of Education 26 (2):173–182 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article addresses the question‘What is the justification of higher education in modern society?’ It takes issue with writers such as Alasdair Macintyre and Allan Bloom, who argue that the fragmentation of value characteristic of modernity has undermined the possibility of providing a coherent justification of higher education. Against MacIntyre and Bloom, I argue that we should understand education as a means of developing reflective consciousness in students, and that that will require fragmentation and the immanent conflict of traditions rather than a background of agreed values.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#316,410)

6 months
14 (#234,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry.Alasdair Macintyre - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (258):533-534.
The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction.Wayne C. Booth - 1990 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (3):247-248.

View all 7 references / Add more references