Oregon's Denial Disabilities and Quality of Life

Hastings Center Report 22 (6):21 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In using quality of life as a guide to rationing health services, Oregon laid itself open to charges of bias against the disabled—charges that cannot be dismissed out of hand.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
37 (#607,693)

6 months
12 (#290,681)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Disability Discrimination and Patient-Sensitive Health-Related Quality of Life.Lasse Nielsen - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):142-153.
Disability: An Agenda for Bioethics.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):36-44.
Cost-Effectiveness and Disability Discrimination.Dan W. Brock - 2009 - Economics and Philosophy 25 (1):27-47.
Oregon's experiment.Michael Brannigan - 1993 - Health Care Analysis 1 (1):15-32.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references