Remarks on vagueness and arbitrariness

Mind 116 (461):115-119 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

other things, that the Vagueness Argument for unrestricted composition fails. In ‘Vagueness and Arbitrariness: Merricks on Composition’, Elizabeth Barnes objects to my argument. This paper replies to Barnes, and also offers further support for the views defended in my original paper.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
237 (#110,861)

6 months
22 (#137,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Ordinary objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Composition.Daniel Z. Korman & Chad Carmichael - 2016 - Oxford Handbooks Online.
Against the vagueness argument.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):335-340.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references