Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument

Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will examine two responses to the argument from marginal cases; the argument from kinds and the similarity argument. I will argue that these arguments are insufficient to show that all humans have moral status but no animals do. This does not prove that animals have moral status but it does shift the burden of proof onto those who want to maintain that all humans are morally considerable, but no animals are.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
Moral Status of Animals from Marginal Cases.Julia Tanner - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 263–264.
Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.
Natural Law and Animal Rights.Gary Chartier - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (1):33-46.
The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap.Oscar Horta - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):142-154.
Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.
Como Não Devemos Discriminar com Base na Espécie.Diogo Santos & Ricardo Miguel - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1495-1516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-08

Downloads
130 (#168,431)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Tanner
Durham University

Citations of this work

The Core Argument for Veganism.Stijn Bruers - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):271-290.
Speciesism as a Moral Heuristic.Stijn Bruers - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):489-501.
In Search of Moral Illusions.Stijn Bruers - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (2):283-303.
Rowlands, Rawlsian Justice and Animal Experimentation.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):569-587.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1871 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Morals by agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.

View all 79 references / Add more references