Dummett’s argument against classical logic

Philosophia 27 (3-4):359-382 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defence of the Mind Argument.Erik Carlson - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):393-400.
An argument inphysics II.Howard J. Curzer - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):359-382.
The logic of rationality.Sharon Ryan - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):525-528.
The logic of temptation.Paul M. Hughes - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):89-110.
On Kant’s argument in the second analogy.Robert Lantin - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (3-4):483-495.
Knowability and intuitionistic logic.David Vidi & Graham Solomon - 2001 - Philosophia 28 (1-4):319-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#278,597)

6 months
11 (#337,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michaelis Michael
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Elements of Intuitionism.Michael Dummett - 1977 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Roberto Minio.
The Runabout Inference-Ticket.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Analysis 21 (2):38-39.
What is a Theory of Meaning? (II).Michael Dummett - 1976 - In Gareth Evans & John McDowell (eds.), What is a Theory of Meaning? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tonk, Plonk and Plink.Nuel Belnap - 1962 - Analysis 22 (6):130-134.

View all 18 references / Add more references