A dedekind finite borel set

Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):1-17 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we prove three theorems about the theory of Borel sets in models of ZF without any form of the axiom of choice. We prove that if \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}B2ω{B\subseteq 2^\omega}\end{document} is a Gδσ-set then either B is countable or B contains a perfect subset. Second, we prove that if 2ω is the countable union of countable sets, then there exists an Fσδ set \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}C2ω{C\subseteq 2^\omega}\end{document} such that C is uncountable but contains no perfect subset. Finally, we construct a model of ZF in which we have an infinite Dedekind finite \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}D2ω{D\subseteq 2^\omega}\end{document} which is Fσδ.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A remark on hereditarily nonparadoxical sets.Péter Komjáth - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):165-175.
Peter Fishburn’s analysis of ambiguity.Mark Shattuck & Carl Wagner - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (2):153-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
56 (#424,513)

6 months
9 (#445,453)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Does Imply, Uniformly?Alessandro Andretta & Lorenzo Notaro - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set theory and the continuum hypothesis.Paul J. Cohen - 1966 - New York,: W. A. Benjamin.
Believing the axioms. I.Penelope Maddy - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):481-511.
The Axiom of Choice.Thomas J. Jech - 1973 - Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
The structure of amorphous sets.J. K. Truss - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 73 (2):191-233.

View all 12 references / Add more references