Has “length” any objective meaning?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):210 – 212 (1924)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

reprint Miller, E. V. (1924) "I.—Has “length” any objective meaning?". Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 2(3):210-212

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

PAUL, E. F., MILLER, F. D. JNR and PAUL, J. : "Human Rights".S. M. Uniacke - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64:241.
Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller.Valerie Gutmann - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):729-731.
Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller.Valerie Gutmann - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):729-731.
Teleology and the product analogy.Mohan Matthen - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1):21 – 37.
Pot bites Kettle: A reply to Miller.William G. Lycan - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):212 – 213.
Miller, Alexander, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics.C. Miller - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):279.
Relativity and real length.W. R. Boyce Gibson - 1923 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):28 – 33.
Smysl života podle V. E. Frankla.Peter Tavel - 2008 - Filosoficky Casopis 56:465-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#1,329,838)

6 months
6 (#882,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references