Research Ethics and Misguided Moral Intuition

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):111-116 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term therapeutic misconception was coined by Paul Appelbaum and his colleagues to describe the tendency of patients enrolled in clinical trials to confuse research participation with the personal clinical attention characteristic of medical care. It has not been recognized that an analogous therapeutic misconception pervades ethical thinking about clinical research with patient-subjects. Investigators and bioethicists often judge the ethics of clinical research based on ethical standards appropriate to the physician-patient relationship in therapeutic medicine. This ethical approach to clinical research constitutes a misconception because it fails to appreciate the ethically significant differences between clinical research and clinical care.In this article I argue that the assumption that the ethical principles governing the practice of therapeutic medicine should also apply to clinical research with patient- subjects produces incoherence in research ethics and erroneous guidance concerning certain controversial research designs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evaluating the therapeutic misconception.Franklin G. Miller & Steven Joffe - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):353-366.
Time to Stop Worrying about the Therapeutic Misconception.David S. Wendler - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):272-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
171 (#136,526)

6 months
5 (#1,002,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franklin Miller
Columbia University