Read on Bradwardine on the Liar Paradox

Abstract

The thesis of the present note is that the resemblance between Bradwardine’s highly instructive definition of truth, and what emerges from Tarski’s method of defining truth, is much closer than Read’s discussion reveals. Each approach, however, has serious defects

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Miller, Bradwardine and the Truth.Stephen Read - 2011 - Discusiones Filosóficas 12 (18):229-35.
Truth, the Liar, and Tarski's Semantics.Gila Sher - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 143–163.
Modal models for bradwardine's theory of truth.Greg Restall - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (2):225-240.
This is the Title of This Thesis.Hiroshi Aoyama - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paradoxes of Signification.Stephen Read - 2016 - Vivarium 54 (4):335-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,374,231)

6 months
12 (#304,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references