The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics

In Neil Sinclair (ed.), The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 206-225 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What views are the primary target of Moore’s fallacy and his open question argument? A common answer, I suspect, would be naturalistic approaches to morality. It is the naturalistic fallacy, after all. But in fact both his fallacy and his argument apply just as straightforwardly to supernatural approaches to morality as well. In this chapter, I focus specifically on how philosophers of religion have tried to grounds morality in God in ways that are clearly relevant to Moore’s project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121-134.
Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley Jr - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121 - 134.
The Naturalistic Fallacy.Neil Sinclair (ed.) - 2018 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The Naturalistic Fallacy.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Richmond Journal of Philosophy 13.
Is Moore a Metaphysical Ethicist?Sibel Oktar - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:317-323.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-30

Downloads
5 (#1,749,582)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Miller
Wake Forest University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references