On Theoretical Incomprehensibility

Philosophies 4 (3):49 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This contribution tentatively outlines the presumed conceptual duality between the issues of _incompleteness_ and _incomprehensibility_—The first being more formal in nature and able to be declined in various ways until specified in the literature as _theoretical incompleteness_. This is _theoretical_ and not temporary, which is admissible and the completion prosecutable. As considered in the literature, theoretical incompleteness refers to _uncertainty principles_ in physics, incompleteness in mathematics, oracles for the Turing Machine, _logical openness_ as the multiplicity of models focusing on coherence more than the optimum selections, _fuzziness_, _quasiness_, e.g., quasi-crystals, quasi-systems, and quasi-periodicity, which are intended as the space of equivalences that allow for coherent processes of emergence. The issue of incomprehensibility cannot be considered without reference to an agent endowed with cognitive abilities. In this article, we consider incomprehensibility as understood here as not generally scientifically explicable, i.e., with the available knowledge, as such incomprehensibility may be temporary, pending theoretical and technological advances, or deemed to be absolute as coincident with eventual _definitive_, theoretical non-explicability, and incomprehensibility. We considered the _theoretically incomprehensibility_ mostly in three main ways: as the inexhaustibility of the multiplicity of constructivist reality as given by the theoretically incomprehensible endless loop of incomprehensible−comprehensible, and by existential questions. Moreover, _theoretical incomprehensibility is intended as evidence of the logical openness of both the world and of understanding itself._ The role of theoretical incomprehensibility is intended as a source of theoretical research issues such as paradoxes and paradigm shifts, where it is a matter of having cognitive strategies and approaches to look for, cohabit, combine, and use comprehensibility and (theoretical) incomprehensibility. The usefulness of imaginary numbers comes to mind. Can we support such research for local, temporary, and theoretical incomprehensibility with suitable approaches such as software tools, for instance, that simulate the logical frameworks of incomprehensibility? Is this a step toward a kind of _artificial creativity leading to paradigm shifts_? The most significant novelty of the article lies in the focus on the concept of theoretical incomprehensibility and distinguishing it from incomprehensibility and considering different forms of understanding. It is a matter of identifying strategies to _act_ and _coexist_ with the theoretically incomprehensible, to _represent_ and _use_ it, for example when dealing with imaginary numbers and quantum contexts where classical comprehensibility is theoretically impossible. Can we think of forms of non-classical understanding? In this article, these topics are developed in conceptual and philosophical ways.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On incomprehensibility in schizophrenia.Mads Gram Henriksen - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):105-129.
Through a glass darkly: on the enigmatic nature of science.Jürgen Mittelstrass - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (23):1-4.
Through a glass darkly: on the enigmatic nature of science.Jürgen Mittelstraß - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):1-4.
Through a glass darkly: on the enigmatic nature of science.Jürgen Mittelstrass - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (23):1-4.
Incomprehensibility.Heinimaa - Finland - 2003 - In Bill Fulford, Katherine Morris, John Z. Sadler & Giovanni Stanghellini, Nature and Narrative: An Introduction to the New Philosophy of Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.
Incomprehensibility.Markus Heinimaa - 2003 - In Bill Fulford, Katherine Morris, John Z. Sadler & Giovanni Stanghellini, Nature and Narrative: An Introduction to the New Philosophy of Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 217--30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-11

Downloads
18 (#1,157,809)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?