Husserl and Cinematographic Depictive Images: The Conflict between the Actor and the Character

Studia Phaenomenologica 16:269-293 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to John Brough, we can use Husserl’s theory of image consciousness to explain the conflict between the actor and the character in cinematographic depictions in terms of an empirical conflict between the “image object” and the “physical thing.” I disagree with him and I shall show that the conflict between the actor and the character can only be explained in terms of a non-empirical conflict between two “image subjects.” The empirical conflict that concerns the subject is between how the actor or the character appears in image consciousness and how it appears or would appear in perception, that is, between the “image subject” and the “subject as it appears in perception.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Depicting and seeing-in. The ‘Sujet’ in Husserl’s phenomenology of images.Patrick Eldridge - 2018 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (3):555-578.
The Phenomenology of ChatGPT: A Semiotics.Thomas Byrne - 2024 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 31 (3):6-27.
Phenomenology of VR Images.Fabrizia Bandi - 2023 - Studia Phaenomenologica 23:295-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-14

Downloads
57 (#375,252)

6 months
9 (#475,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Regina-Nino Mion (née Kurg)
Estonian Academy of Arts

Citations of this work

Violence and image.Cristian Ciocan - 2021 - Continental Philosophy Review 54 (3):331-348.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references