The Systems of Relevance Logic

Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 1 (1):87-102 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The system R, or more precisely the pure implicational fragment R›, is considered by the relevance logicians as the most important. The another central system of relevance logic has been the logic E of entailment that was supposed to capture strict relevant implication. The next system of relevance logic is RM or R-mingle. The question is whether adding mingle axiom to R› yields the pure implicational fragment RM› of the system? As concerns the weak systems there are at least two approaches to the problem. First of all, it is possible to restrict a validity of some theorems. In another approach we can investigate even weaker logics which have no theorems and are characterized only by rules of deducibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Algebraic Study of Two Deductive Systems of Relevance Logic.Josep Maria Font & Gonzalo Rodríguez - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (3):369-397.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
Incompleteness for Quantified Relevance Logics.Kit Fine - 1989 - In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic. Dordrecht and Boston: Springer. pp. 205-225.
Substructural Fuzzy-Relevance Logic.Eunsuk Yang - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (3):471-491.
R-Mingle is Nice, and so is Arnon Avron.J. Michael Dunn - 2021 - In Ofer Arieli & Anna Zamansky (eds.), Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics. Springer Verlag. pp. 141-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-12

Downloads
462 (#60,498)

6 months
119 (#44,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation.Edwin Mares - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Symbolic logic.Frederic Brenton Fitch - 1952 - New York,: Ronald Press Co..
Relevance Logic.Michael Dunn & Greg Restall - 1983 - In Dov M. Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lectures on propositional calculi.Ryszard Wójcicki - 1984 - Ossolineum [Poland]: Pub. House of the Polish Academy of Sciences.

View all 12 references / Add more references