Delegitimizing Transphobic Views in Academia

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that academic institutions have a pro tanto obligation to delegitimize transphobic views, which in many contexts is undefeated. By this, I mean academic institutions generally should not take such views seriously as viable candidates for belief, though sometimes this obligation may be outweighed by other considerations. Three premises together justify this conclusion. First, if academic institutions do not delegitimize transphobic views, then they structurally perpetuate the subordination of trans people. Second, institutions have a pro tanto obligation to avoid structurally perpetuating subordination, which can only be defeated when such avoidance is excessively burdensome. Third, academic institutions can delegitimize transphobic views in a manner that is not excessively burdensome, at least in many contexts. More specifically, delegitimizing transphobic views aligns with important institutional norms and a robust notion of academic freedom.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-11

Downloads
49 (#484,203)

6 months
49 (#104,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Logan Mitchell
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references