Primate theory of mind is a Turing test

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):127-128 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes's literature review of deception, imitation, and self-recognition is inadequate, misleading, and erroneous. The anaesthetic artifact hypothesis of self-recognition is unsupported by the data she herself examines. Her proposed experiment is tantalizing, indicating that theory of mind is simply a Turing test.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What can we learn from the absence of evidence?Thomas R. Zentall - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):133-134.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?Colin Gray & Phil Russell - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):121-121.
The Turing Test is a Thought Experiment.Bernardo Gonçalves - 2023 - Minds and Machines 33 (1):1-31.
In Defence of a Reciprocal Turing Test.Fintan Mallory - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (4):659-680.
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates.Cecilia M. Heyes - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):101-114.
Newell's list.Joseph Agassi - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):601-602.
Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#413,576)

6 months
13 (#235,795)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Minds, machines and Turing: The indistinguishability of indistinguishables.Stevan Harnad - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references