Dworkin’s Theory of Rights in the Age of Proportionality

The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 12 (2):281-299 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is probably no conceptualization of rights more famous than Ronald Dworkin’s claim that they are “trumps.” This seems to stand in stark contrast to the dominant, proportionality-based strand of rights discourse, according to which rights, instead of trumping competing interests, ultimately have to be balanced against them. The goal of this article is to reconcile Dworkin’s work and proportionality and thereby make a contribution to our understanding of both. It offers a critical reconstruction of Dworkin’s theory of rights which does away with the misleading label of rights as “trumps” and shows that, far from being in conflict with proportionality, properly understood Dworkin’s work supports and supplements that doctrine and provides a much-needed account of its moral foundation as being about human dignity, freedom, and equality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equality & the Rule of Law: R. M. Dworkin & Liberalism.Sheldon Sherwood Wein - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Dworkin’s Rights Conception of the Rule of Law in Criminal Law.Briain Jansen - 2017 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 46 (2):160-176.
Dworkin's Shadow: Equality Rights and the Supreme Court of Canada's Loss of Dignity.Bradley W. Miller - 2013 - Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (7):149-184.
A critique of proportionality and balancing.Urbina Molfino & Francisco Javier - 2017 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-30

Downloads
51 (#447,550)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references