Wright on Borderline Cases and Bivalence

Abstract

The aim of this paper is, firstly to explain Crispin Wright’s quandary view of vagueness, his intuitionistic response to sorites and the relation of borderline cases and bivalence, and, secondly assess the objections to his ideas.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

On what it is to be in a quandary.Patrick Greenough - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):399 - 408.
Borderline cases and bivalence.Diana Raffman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (1):1-31.
Truth, Falsity, and Borderline Cases.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (1):211-244.
Recent Work on Vagueness.M. Eklund - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):352-363.
Higher-Order Vagueness and Borderline Nestings: A Persistent Confusion.Susanne Bobzien - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (1):1-43.
Borderline Hermaphrodites: Higher-order Vagueness by Example.R. Sorensen - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):393-408.
The sorites paradox.Richmond Campbell - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (3-4):175-191.
Higher-order Vagueness, Radical Unclarity, and Absolute Agnosticism.Susanne Bobzien - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10:1-30.
Peirce and the specification of borderline vagueness.David W. Agler - 2013 - Semiotica 2013 (193):195-215.
Liberalism, entitlement, and verdict exclusion.Sven Rosenkranz - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):481 - 497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-03

Downloads
504 (#56,303)

6 months
94 (#65,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references