Tradition: Why Shils and Polanyi Abandoned the Action Frame of Reference

Tradition and Discovery 39 (3):5-28 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Polanyi began thinking and writing about tradition long before he met Edward Shils in 1946. Polanyi’s religious experience in 1913 became part of the background for his thinking about tradition, and tradition entered into his thinking about spontaneous order and moral inversion. Polanyi and Shils both knew Karl Mannheim before they met one another, and had similar criticisms of Mannheim’s sociology. Soon after they met, both Polanyi and Shils were briefly enthusiastic about the Action Frame of Reference, which Shils helped create. Neither of them used the Action Frame of Reference in their later work. One of the reasons was its neglect of tradition, and another was that is was simply too complex to be a useful conceptual tool. Polanyi’s thinking about tradition did not change much after Personal Knowledge, but Shils continued to modify his thinking about tradition until the final years of his life

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tradition in the Work of Shils and Polanyi.Steven Grosby - 2012 - Tradition and Discovery 39 (3):38-42.
Further Reflections on Shils and Polanyi.Steven Grosby - 2000 - Tradition and Discovery 27 (1):13-15.
Recovering the Thought of Edward Shils.Struan Jacobs - 2021 - Tradition and Discovery 47 (3):4-13.
Edward Shils as Stranger, Social Thought as Vocation.Peter C. Blum - 2021 - Tradition and Discovery 47 (3):14-18.
Edward Shils' theory of tradition.Struan Jacobs - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):139-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
70 (#301,116)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references