Criticism Cubed.Aesthetics and Criticism

Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):274 - 284 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Unhappily, most writers who seek to relieve the present "dreary" situation in aesthetics offer us either verbal pettifogging or nineteenth century "systems." We are, therefore, indebted to Harold Osborne for publishing a brave, bold, wise, and defective book in the field. Despite their defects, these essays clarify some important issues in important ways. They deserve the serious attention of everyone seriously interested in art.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Sport. [REVIEW]Paul Gaffney - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (4):863-864.
A Sound Self-Referential Argument?Robert Young - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):112 - 119.
Harold Osborne, Abstraction and Artifice in Twentieth-Century Art.Peter Mccormick - 1984 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):467-470.
Aesthetic concepts: essays after Sibley.Emily Brady & Jerrold Levinson (eds.) - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Language of Art and Art Criticism. [REVIEW]W. B. K. - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):373-373.
Philosophy, Poetry, History. An Anthology of Essays. [REVIEW]J. V. M. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (3):548-549.
Vision and Design. [REVIEW]C. P. A. - 1957 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (3):538-538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
19 (#1,078,214)

6 months
6 (#866,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references