Grimes on the tacking by disjunction problem

Disputatio 1 (17):16-20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I focus on the so-called "tacking by disjunction problem". Namely, the problem to the effect that, if a hypothesis H is confirmed by a statement E, H is confirmed by the disjunction E v F, for whatever statement F. I show that the attempt to settle this difficulty made by Grimes 1990, in a paper apparently forgotten by today methodologists, is irremediably faulty.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genuine confirmation and tacking by conjunction.Michael Schippers & Gerhard Schurz - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1):321-352.
First Steps in Philosophical Taxonomy.I. L. Humberstone - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):467-478.
First Steps in a Philosophical Taxonomy.I. L. Humberstone - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):476-478.
Solving the Tacking Problem with Contrast Classes.Jake Chandler - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):489-502.
Burge on Perception and the Disjunction Problem.Jon Altschul - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (2):251-269.
Horwich, Hempel, and hypothetico-deductivism.Ken Gemes - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
Tacking by conjunction, genuine confirmation and convergence to certainty.Gerhard Schurz - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (3):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
185 (#131,890)

6 months
29 (#119,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?