- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Now you see it, now you don't: More data at the cognitive level needed before the PAD model can be accepted
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):770-+ (2005)
Abstract
Before a general cognitive model for recurrent complex visual hallucinations (RCVH) is accepted, there must be more research into the neuropsychological and cognitive characteristics of the various disorders in which they occur. Currently available data are insufficient to distinguish whether the similar phenomenology of RCVH across different disorders is in fact produced by a single or by multiple cognitive mechanisms.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- adsabs.harvard.edu
(no proxy) - journals.cambridge.org (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [2] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [3] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [4] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [5] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [6] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hallucinating objects versus hallucinating subjects.Alexei V. Samsonovich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):772-773.
Still PADing along: Perception and attention remain key factors in understanding complex visual hallucinations.Daniel Collerton, Elaine Perry & Ian McKeith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):776-794.
Monoamines in RCVH: Implications from sleep, neurophysiologic, and clinical research.Roumen Kirov - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):768-769.
Why people see things that are not there: A novel perception and attention deficit model for recurrent complex visual hallucinations.Daniel Collerton, Elaine Perry & Ian McKeith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):737-757.
Common or distinct deficits for auditory and visual hallucinations?Johanna C. Badcock & Murray T. Maybery - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):757-758.
Believing is seeing in schizophrenia: The role of top-down processing.Duje Tadin, Peiyan Wong, Michael W. Mebane, Michael J. Berkowitz, Hollister Trott & Sohee Park - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):775-775.
Catatonia is the rosetta stone of psychosis.T. Carroll Brendan & D. Carroll Tressa - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):759-760.
The emergence of proto-objects in complex visual hallucinations.Glenda Halliday - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):767-768.
A signal-detection-theory representation of normal and hallucinatory perception.Igor Dolgov & Michael K. McBeath - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):761-762.
Visual hallucinations, attention, and neural circuitry: Perspectives from schizophrenia research.Kevin M. Spencer & Robert W. McCarley - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):774-774.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
89 (#233,195)
6 months
21 (#136,957)
2009-01-28
Downloads
89 (#233,195)
6 months
21 (#136,957)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2