Proper Definition in "Principia Mathematica"

International Logic Review 7:80 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an article in "mind," 1971, pp. 282-283, the authors raised objections to a certain definition in "principia mathematica." in this paper we demonstrate that (a) their argument is faulty, (b) their suggested remedies are unsatisfactory, and (c) there is nothing wrong with the original definition

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why there is no Frege-Russell definition of number.Jolen Galaugher - 2013 - In Nicholas Griffin & Bernard Linsky (eds.), The Palgrave Centenary Companion to Principia Mathematica. London and Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Foundations of probability in mathematical logic.Theodore Hailperin - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (1):125-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
12 (#1,361,137)

6 months
4 (#1,233,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references