Science, Anti-Science, Pseudoscience, Truth

(ed.)
Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Bigg Books (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thie article is an edited transcript of a conversation between Ian James Kidd and Chiara Ambrosio. We discuss Feyerabend's alleged 'defences' of astrology, voodoo, and other topics; the history of the demarcation problem in C20 philosophy of science; the relation of pluralism and disunity to attempts to distinguish sciences from pseudosciences: and changing arguments against pseudosciences.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

Pseudoscience after Feyerabend.Chiara Ambrosio & Ian Kidd

Similar books and articles

Pseudoscience after Feyerabend.Chiara Ambrosio & Ian Kidd - forthcoming - In Anthony Morgan (ed.), Science, Anti-Science, Pseudoscience, Truth. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Bigg Books.
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem.Maarten Boudry - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):83-101.
Evolved to be irrational?: evolutionary and cognitive foundations of pseudosciences.Stefaan Blancke & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press.
The Social Psychology of “Pseudoscience”: A Brief History.Arthur Still & Windy Dryden - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):265-290.
Feyerabend’s Realism and Expansion of Pluralism in the 1970s.Jonathan Y. Tsou - forthcoming - In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Shaw Jamie & Carla Fehr (eds.), Values, Pluralism, and Pragmatism: Themes from the Work of Matthew J. Brown. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer.
Pseudoscience and the Demarcation Problem.Massimo Pigliucci - 2023 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Are Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem.Angelo Fasce - 2019 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):155-175.
Science and Pseudoscience How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise.Martin Mahner - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 29.
Pluralism, logical empiricism, and the problem of pseudoscience.George A. Reisch - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
Pseudoscience.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-11

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references