The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):317-322 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From 28 February to the end of March 2012, the Italian media reacted fiercely to the Giubilini and Minerva paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics a few days earlier. The first article viewed the proposal as analogous to ‘barbaric invasions’, but in a first stage of the debate it could be seen as a case of the usual controversy between Catholics and secularists. Then emotive reactions prevailed and a flood of papers expressed strong opposition to ‘infanticide’. The authors were even deemed insane; the fact that both are Italian certainly increased interest in the subject as well as surprise at their proposal, which some reckoned to be an insult to their ‘national identity’. Even freedom of academic research and discussion was put in question, and defenders of free debate were accused of being supporters of the theory of infanticide

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#867,763)

6 months
10 (#377,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maurizio Mori
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references