The Real W almart

Business and Society Review 120 (3):385-408 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Walmart Company is one of the favorite punching bags of market critics. They accuse this firm of underpaying employees, dealing unfairly with customers, exploiting suppliers, and bankrupting small competitors. Various political jurisdictions have banned this firm from their environs, either implicitly or explicitly. The present article offers a more nuanced position on the behemoth from Arkansas. Although it has some flaws, there is an overwhelming case to be made in its behalf as an employer, competitor, purchaser, benefactor of customers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organizational Storytelling, Ethics and Morality: How Stories Frame Limits of Behavior in Organizations.Michael Poulton - 2005 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 10 (2):4-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-21

Downloads
29 (#773,918)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation.Matt Zwolinski - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):689-727.
Facts and counterfactuals in economic law.Jörg Guido Hülsmann - 200 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (1):57-102.
Reply to Hellmer on sweatshops.Walter Block - 2010 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 22 (1):719-739.

Add more references