Quibbling and the Fallacy of Critical Scholarship: Response to Thorstensen

NanoEthics 8 (3):251-254 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this text, I respond to a paper by Erik Thorstensen entitled “Public Involvement and Narrative Fallacies of Nanotechnologies.” In his paper, Thorstensen critically reviews a previous ELSA project on engagement and nanotechnology known by the acronym DEEPEN. While I agree that the ELSA community could benefit from the critical examination of earlier research, I believe the approach taken by Thorstensen is not a constructive one. My response deals with three main issues: the character of the paper, narrative theory, and interdisciplinarity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-10

Downloads
28 (#788,995)

6 months
5 (#1,013,651)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?