Hypoxic air machines: performance enhancement through effective training--or cheating?

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):112-113 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following an investigation of the football clubs using hypoxic air machines, the Australian Football League has decided not to ban the machines. This seems, however, to be a reluctant decision since it appears that some AFL officials still feel there is something undesirable about the use of the machines. Use of the machines raises questions about performance enhancement and the role of technology. It prompts consideration of the grounds for banning performance enhancing devices or substances and raises questions about what constitutes a drugA machine being used by Australian footballers, which is designed to imitate the effects of high altitude training and enhance performance has prompted an investigation by the Australian Football League and sparked debate in the media. The AFL decided not to ban the machine but a sense of unease about its use remains and there seems to be some difficulty in articulating the cause of that unease. The league’s medical officers say the hypoxicators do not contravene their antidoping code or the league’s rules,1,2 but according to at least one AFL official, the use of the machines is “sending the wrong message …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary.C. Tamburrini - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):114-114.
Commentary.T. Tannsjo - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):113-113.
Commentary.P. Fricker - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):115-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
65 (#326,813)

6 months
21 (#141,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?