Cats on the Table, New Blood for Old Dogs: What Distinguishes Reading Philosophers (on Poets) from Reading Poets?

In Sebastian Sunday Grève & Jakub Mácha (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 29-52 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Secondly, as utterances, our performances are also heir to certain other kinds of ill which infect all utterances. And these likewise, although again they might be brought into a more general account, we are deliberately at present excluding. I mean, for example, the following: a performative utterance will be in a peculiar way hollow or void if said by an actor on the stage, or introduced in a poem, or spoken in soliloquy. This applies in a similar manner to any and every utterance — a sea-change in special circumstances. Language in such circumstances is in special ways — intelligibly — used not seriously, but in ways parasitic upon its normal use — ways which fall under the doctrine of the etiolations of language. All this we are excluding from consideration. Our performative utterances, felicitous or not, are to be understood as issued in ordinary circumstances.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-08

Downloads
8 (#1,589,825)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Mulhall
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references