Equal Pay for All: An Idea Whose Time Has Not, and Will Not, Come

In Anders Örtenblad, Debating Equal Pay for All: Economy, Practicability and Ethics. Palgrave macmillan. pp. 21-35 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proposal on offer is a radical form of egalitarianism. Under it, each citizen receives the same income, regardless of profession or indeed whether he or she works or not. This proposal is bad for two reasons. First, it is inefficient. It would eliminate nearly all incentive to work, thereby shrinking national income and leaving all citizens poorly off (albeit equally poorly off). I illustrate this inefficiency via an indifference curve analysis. Second, the proposal would be regarded as unjust by almost everyone. The empirical work on justice makes this plain. Equal pay for equal work is desirable; equal pay no matter what is something else entirely. It is an idea not likely to find adherents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-09

Downloads
697 (#39,177)

6 months
134 (#39,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Mulligan
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Do People Deserve their Economic Rents?Thomas Mulligan - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):163-190.

Add more references