Rights, Roles and Interests

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16 (2):95-115 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that rights that protect our performance of roles are grounded in our interests in performing that role. Many of valuable roles are partly constituted by duties or obligations. Nonetheless these roles—even apparently burdensome roles—contribute to our interests. Once it is bestowed upon them, the role has special value to its bearer. Under certain conditions, the individual’s interest in performing their role is sufficient to ground rights. I conclude by briefly discussing the possibility of detached or non-committed rights attributions. Within law and other systems of positive norms, role-based rights may also be attributed in a non-committed way in situations where it is believed by others that the roles in question are grounded in the interests of their bearers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-07

Downloads
46 (#478,016)

6 months
22 (#134,591)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Mullins
University of Queensland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are there any natural rights?Herbert Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
The Nature of Claim-Rights.Leif Wenar - 2013 - Ethics 123 (2):202-229.
Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots.David Miller - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):63-81.
XI-Why is it Disrespectful to Violate Rights?Rowan Cruft - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (2pt2):201-224.

View all 17 references / Add more references