Segregation That No One Seeks

Philosophy of Science 79 (1):38-62 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines a series of Schelling-like models of residential segregation, in which agents prefer to be in the minority. We demon- strate that as long as agents care about the characteristics of their wider community, they tend to end up in a segregated state. We then investigate the process that causes this, and conclude that the result hinges on the similarity of informational states amongst agents of the same type. This is quite di erent from Schelling-like behavior, and sug- gests (in his terms) that segregation is an instance of macro behavior which can arise from a wide variety of micro motives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatics and biosemiotics.Alexei A. Sharov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):245-257.
Residential Segregation and Rethinking the Imperative of Integration.Ronald R. Sundstrom - 2019 - In Joseph S. Biehl, Samantha Noll & Sharon M. Meagher (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of the City. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 216–228.
マイクロ化学プラントのための協調型シミュレーションモデル取得機構.松本 秀行 木村 直樹 - 2006 - Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 21:36-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-07

Downloads
136 (#162,858)

6 months
26 (#123,560)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Weisberg
University of Pennsylvania
Ryan Muldoon
University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

Understanding from Machine Learning Models.Emily Sullivan - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (1):109-133.
Understanding (with) Toy Models.Alexander Reutlinger, Dominik Hangleiter & Stephan Hartmann - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (4):1069-1099.
Understanding (With) Toy Models.Alexander Reutlinger, Dominik Hangleiter & Stephan Hartmann - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axx005.
What’s new in the new ideology critique?Kirun Sankaran - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (5):1441-1462.
Understanding with theoretical models.Petri Ylikoski & N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (1):19-36.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Robustness Analysis.Michael Weisberg - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):730-742.
The Robust Volterra Principle.Michael Weisberg & Kenneth Reisman - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (1):106-131.
Robust simulations.Ryan Muldoon - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):873-883.

Add more references