The democratic potential of confucian minben thought

Asian Philosophy 10 (1):33 – 47 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that although the Confucian idea of 'minben' is not synonymous with democracy, some its tenets are conducive to the promotion of a regime in which citizens are politically and economically empowered. In particular, I focus on the way that Confucius, Mencius and Jia Yi stress that government should meet the basic needs of its people. Material well-being is an important precondition of democracy that is often overlooked in contemporary discussions of Chinese government, which usually focus on negative rights or the authoritarian state.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#376,745)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy.David Elstein - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.
Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?Pak-Hang Wong - 2016 - Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2):154-168.
Confucian democracy as popular sovereignty.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2019 - Asian Philosophy 29 (3):201-220.
Confucian Political Order and the Ethics/politics Distinction: A Reassessment.Yutang Jin - 2022 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 21 (3):389-405.
War and Confucianism.Fuchuan Yao - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (2):213-226.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references