Is Materialism a Consequence of Natural Science?

Rocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 24 (2):139-149 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Naturalism is neither a consequence nor a presupposition of natural science in a threefold way: the principle of matter, the principle of supervenience and the principle of the causal closure of the world are metaphysical principles. They are true, if naturalism is true. So, if you are a naturalist, you should find reasons for your worldview which are independent from natural science. But it is hard to see how this could work.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the causal completeness of physics.Agustín Vicente - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):149 – 171.
The Typical Principle.Isaac Wilhelm - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Three indications for the existence of God in causal metaphysics.Uwe Meixner - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):33 - 46.
Эвристический Потенциал Метафизики.Vladimir A. Yakovlev - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:337-342.
What Is Naturalism? And Should We Be Naturalists?William Hasker - 2013 - Philosophia Christi 15 (1):21-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-17

Downloads
26 (#839,768)

6 months
7 (#669,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references