Higher Order Reflection Principles

Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):474-489 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In [1] and [2] there is a development of a class theory, whose axioms were formulated by Bernays and based on a reflection principle. See [3]. These axioms are formulated in first order logic with ∈:Extensionality.Class specification. Ifϕis a formula andAis not free inϕ, thenNote that “xis a set“ can be written as “∃u”.Subsets.Note also that “B⊆A” can be written as “∀x”.Reflection principle. Ifϕis a formula, thenwhere “uis a transitive set” is the formula “∃v ∧ ∀x∀y” andϕPuis the formulaϕrelativized to subsets ofu.Foundation.Choice for sets.We denote byB1the theory with axioms to.The existence of weakly compact and-indescribable cardinals for everynis established inB1by the method of defining all metamathematical concepts forB1in a weaker theory of classes where the natural numbers can be defined and using the reflection principle to reflect the satisfaction relation; see [1]. There is a proof of the consistency ofB1assuming the existence of a measurable cardinal; see [4] and [5]. In [6] several set and class theories with reflection principles are developed. In them, the existence of inaccessible cardinals and some kinds of indescribable cardinals can be proved; and also there is a generalization of indescribability for higher-order languages using only class parameters.The purpose of this work is to develop higher order reflection principles, including higher order parameters, in order to obtain other large cardinals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Strong Reflection Principle.Sam Roberts - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):651-662.
Bernays and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (1):43-69.
Adding a Nonreflecting Weakly Compact Set.Brent Cody - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (3):503-521.
Higher indescribability and derived topologies.Brent Cody - 2023 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 24 (1).
Set Theory with Urelements.Bokai Yao - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Remarks on Levy's reflection axiom.Martin Dowd - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):79-95.
Reflection Principles and Second-Order Choice Principles with Urelements.Bokai Yao - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (4):103073.
E pluribus unum: Plural logic and set theory.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3):193-221.
Transfinite Cardinals in Paraconsistent Set Theory.Zach Weber - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):269-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#395,123)

6 months
13 (#267,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Strong Reflection Principle.Sam Roberts - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):651-662.
Intrinsic Justifications for Large-Cardinal Axioms.Rupert McCallum - 2021 - Philosophia Mathematica 29 (2):195-213.
Prädikative Klassen.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (2):209 - 241.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings.Robert M. Solovay - 1978 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):73.

Add more references