Genetic enhancement and the fate of the worse off

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):83-89 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: When reflecting on arguments in the debate about genetic technologies, decision makers must try to be empathetic to those who are worse off. Disparities in health and health care in the U.S. pale when global facts are considered. Although U.S. citizens ought to be concerned about the worse off in the U.S., such concern ultimately must be balanced against the urgent imperative to address the plight of those in poor countries. It is a matter of fairness that care and concern be directed to those who are truly worse off in global terms

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Health, priority to the worse off, and time.Anders Herlitz - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):517-527.
Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.Trygve Ottersen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (3):175-180.
Relative priority.Lara Buchak - 2023 - Economics and Philosophy 39 (2):199-229.
The Badness of Unjust Inequality.Ingmar Persson - 2003 - Theoria 69 (1-2):109-124.
Justice and the NICE approach.Richard Cookson - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):99-102.
Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism.Anders Herlitz - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):109-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#696,492)

6 months
4 (#1,232,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references