Should the NHS be privatized? Annual varsity medical debate - London, 22 January 2010

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5:1-3 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Varsity Medical Debate, between Oxford and Cambridge Universities, brings together practitioners and the public, professors, pupils and members of the polis, to facilitate discussion about ethics and policy within healthcare. The motion on privatizing the National Health Service (NHS) was specifically chosen to reflect the growing sentiment in the UK where further discourse upon models of healthcare was required. Time and again, the outcome of British elections pivots upon the topic of financial sustainability of the NHS. Having recently celebrated its sixtieth anniversary, the NHS has become heavily politicized in recent months, especially in the aftermath of the devastating global recession

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,706

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Words and Flesh in the NHS.Sarah Gull - 2008 - Journal of Medical Humanities 29 (1):67-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
62 (#373,961)

6 months
25 (#131,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?