Investor responsibility and Norway’s Government Pension Fund – Global

Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):79-96 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article identifies and critically examines three differentaspects of investor responsibility. First, investors haveresponsibilities toward their clients. Second, investors are responsible for taking steps toreduce the risk that an investment directly or indirectlycontributes to harm. Finally, investorsshould take into consideration the symbolic and signallingeffects of an investment decision. This article discusses howthese responsibilities should be interpreted and also howthey play out in practice. Norway’s Government PensionFund is used as a case in point.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Institutional investor activism on socially responsible investment: effects and expectations.Shuangge Wen - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):308-333.
Practicalities bottleneck to pension fund responsible investment?Riikka Sievänen - 2014 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 23 (3):309-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
17 (#1,150,890)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age.Christopher Kutz - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sharing Responsibility.Larry May - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
Brute luck and responsibility.Peter Vallentyne - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):57-80.
The new Indian claims and original rights to land.David Lyons - 1977 - Social Theory and Practice 4 (3):249–72.

Add more references