Enlightenment grows from fundamentals

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):207-208 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abstract computational analysis. We agree, but argue that the fundamentalist/enlightened dichotomy is a false one: Enlightened research is deeply intertwined with the basic, fundamental work upon which it is based

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Don't throw out the Bayes with the bathwater.Philip M. Fernbach & Steven A. Sloman - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):198-199.
In praise of ecumenical Bayes.Michael D. Lee - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):206-207.
Post hoc rationalism in science.Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):214-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
35 (#623,985)

6 months
11 (#312,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?