Some concerns about the phoneme-like inputs to merge

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):342-343 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a proponent of phoneme-like units in speech perception, I am very sympathetic to Merge's use of phoneme-oriented input. However, in the absence of any known way to provide input in exactly the form assumed, further consideration needs to be given to how the variation in the details of the specification of this input might affect Merge's (and Shortlist's) overall behavior.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The trouble with merge: Modeling speeded target detection.Jonathan Grainger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-332.
One phonemic representation should suffice.David W. Gow - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-331.
Some reasons to save the grapheme and the phoneme.Charles A. Perfetti - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):721-722.
Lexical biases are useful.José R. Benkí - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
Dream production is not chaotic.Mauro Mancia - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):967-968.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#607,693)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references