Priority, Not Equality, for Possible People

Ethics 127 (4):896-911 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How should we choose between uncertain prospects in which different possible people might exist at different levels of wellbeing? Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Fleurbaey offer an egalitarian answer to this question. I give some reasons to reject their answer and then sketch an alternative, which I call person-affecting prioritarianism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

In defense of priority (and equality).Shlomi Segall - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (4):343-364.
Equality versus priority: A useful distinction.John Broome - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):219-228.
Utilitarianism and prioritarianism II.David McCarthy - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):1-33.
The Welfare Diffusion Objection to Prioritarianism.Tomi Francis - 2024 - Economics and Philosophy 40 (1):55-76.
Equality and priority.Martin Peterson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (3):299-309.
Three Kinds of Prioritarianism.Carlos Soto - 2024 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 28 (1).
Utilitarianism and prioritarianism I.David Mccarthy - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):335-363.
Priority, Preference and Value.Martin O'neill - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (3):332-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-02

Downloads
3,974 (#2,092)

6 months
192 (#17,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jake Nebel
Princeton University

References found in this work

Weighing lives.John Broome - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Equality and priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.

View all 23 references / Add more references