Equiconsistencies at subcompact cardinals

Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):207-238 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present equiconsistency results at the level of subcompact cardinals. Assuming SBHδ, a special case of the Strategic Branches Hypothesis, we prove that if δ is a Woodin cardinal and both □ and □δ fail, then δ is subcompact in a class inner model. If in addition □ fails, we prove that δ is Π12\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\Pi_1^2}$$\end{document} subcompact in a class inner model. These results are optimal, and lead to equiconsistencies. As a corollary we also see that assuming the existence of a Woodin cardinal δ so that SBHδ holds, the Proper Forcing Axiom implies the existence of a class inner model with a Π12\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\Pi_1^2}$$\end{document} subcompact cardinal. Our methods generalize to higher levels of the large cardinal hierarchy, that involve long extenders, and large cardinal axioms up to δ is δ+ supercompact for all n < ω. We state some results at this level, and indicate how they are proved.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indestructibility and destructible measurable cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):3-18.
Square principles with tail-end agreement.William Chen & Itay Neeman - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (3-4):439-452.
Strong tree properties for two successive cardinals.Laura Fontanella - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):601-620.
Two-cardinal diamond and games of uncountable length.Pierre Matet - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (3-4):395-412.
A strong partition cardinal above $$\varTheta $$ Θ.Daniel W. Cunningham - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (3-4):403-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
20 (#1,027,136)

6 months
3 (#1,469,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Steel
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Knaster and friends II: The C-sequence number.Chris Lambie-Hanson & Assaf Rinot - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (1):2150002.
The linearity of the Mitchell order.Gabriel Goldberg - 2018 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 18 (1):1850005.
Subcompact Cardinals, Type Omission, and Ladder Systems.Yair Hayut & Menachem Magidor - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):1111-1129.
The comparison lemma.John R. Steel - forthcoming - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Suitable extender models I.W. Hugh Woodin - 2010 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):101-339.
Suitable extender models II: Beyond ω-huge.W. Hugh Woodin - 2011 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 11 (2):115-436.
Square in core models.Ernest Schimmerling & Martin Zeman - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):305-314.
Characterization of □κin core models.Ernest Schimmerling & Martin Zeman - 2004 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 4 (01):1-72.
Iteration Trees.D. A. Martin & J. R. Steel - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):545-546.

View all 11 references / Add more references