Logical empiricism in a historicist framework—something worth caring about?

Asian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1) (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The historicist project that Richardson presents here aims to recover elements of Logical Empiricism that lie not in theorems but in the self-understanding of the actors. The Logical Empiricists had philosophical as well as social and political goals in mind. They were aware that the scientific principles they sought to establish in academic philosophy also influenced the political, social, and cultural spheres. Previous research has worked on the social embedding of Logical Empiricism. By comparison, Richardson proposes the significantly broader framework of “scientific philosophy.” This allows further actors to be taken into account, thus contributing to a better understanding of the self-understanding of the Logical Empiricists. But can this historicist project convince us that Logical Empiricism is “worth caring about”?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-06

Downloads
6 (#1,734,872)

6 months
6 (#677,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elisabeth Nemeth
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and the social order.Robert K. Merton - 1938 - Philosophy of Science 5 (3):321-337.

Add more references