No Argument against Ramsey

Analysis 39 (4):201 - 209 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a defense of frank ramsey's thesis that there is a symmetry between the logical roles of subjects and predicates in subject-Predicate sentences against recent objections

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Significance of Tarski's Theory of Truth.Scott Soames - 1998 - In Understanding Truth. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
The Knowledge Argument and the Refutation of Physicalism.M. Kuna - 2004 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 11 (2):128-142.
What’s in a Name.Andrew Parisi - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):268-277.
Ramsey on universals.Fraser MacBride - 2005 - In Hallvard Lillehammer & David Hugh Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 83-104.
Ramsey's Lost Counterfactual.Caterina Sisti - 2022 - History and Philosophy of Logic 44 (3):311-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
47 (#471,734)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laurence Nemirow
Stanford University

Citations of this work

Geach’s Categorial Grammar.Lloyd Humberstone - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):281 - 317.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references