"Why wasn't Lorentz Einstein?" An Examination of the Scientific Method of H. A. Lorentz

Centaurus 29 (3):205-242 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,180

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-13

Downloads
37 (#669,791)

6 months
8 (#501,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Nersessian
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Mechanisms, principles, and Lorentz's cautious realism.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (4):659-679.
Rethinking the ‘Discovery’ of the electron.Theodore Arabatzis - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4):405-435.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references