A quantum of truth? Querying the alternative benchmark for human cognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):300-302 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We focus on two issues: (1) an unusual, counterintuitive prediction that quantum probability (QP) theory appears to make regarding multiple sequential judgments, and (2) the extent to which QP is an appropriate and comprehensive benchmark for assessing judgment. These issues highlight how QP theory can fall prey to the same problems of arbitrariness that Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) discuss as plaguing other models.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?Daniel Joseph Navarro & Ian Fuss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):299-300.
Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):303-303.
Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.James A. Hampton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):290 - 291.
Comments on Quantum Probability Theory.Steven Sloman - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):47-52.
Quantum probability and comparative cognition.Randolph C. Grace & Simon Kemp - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):287-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
35 (#645,327)

6 months
13 (#257,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references