Civility at the Breaking Point

International Journal of Philosophical Practice 5 (1):71-81 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the recent social phenomenon of the confrontation by critics of government officials while they are out in public, yet engaged in “private” activities, e.g. eating dinner at a restaurant, shopping in a bookstore, or getting into their cars. This paper argues that such confrontations are a symptom of the lack of trust brought on by the absence of shared social values that results in toxic forms of public discourse, the blurring of the classical liberal distinction between the public and the private realms, and the inability to hold one another responsible for the violation of self-avowed moral norms. Implicit in this argument is the conclusion that such confrontations are ineffective at best. Some have suggested more physical intermingling among people who hold conflicting political views in order to establish such trust (Haidt, Wilk). In the absence of such opportunities for intermingling, sharing our value-laden personal stories with each other, in the spirit and style of Michelle Obama’s memoir Becoming, might help to create tolerance and trust among those with differing political perspectives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
14 (#1,268,432)

6 months
8 (#560,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Newhart
Eastern Kentucky University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Trust, Communities, and the Standing To Hold Accountable.Thomas Wilk - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):1-22.

Add more references