Conceptual Relativism

Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):71-87 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptual relativism is characterized and elucitated in such a way that its force can be appreciated. It is argued that the usual attempts to dismiss it as a conceptual confusion fail. Then two attempts to articulate a conception of rationality adequate to show how conceptual relativism rests on a mistake are examined and shown to be at the best only partially successful. The upshot is, that, counter-intuitive as it is, the problem of conceptual relativism is still very much with us.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual Relativism.Kai Nielsen - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):71-87.
Conceptual Relativism.Kenneth A. Taylor - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales, A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 159–178.
Conceptual relativism.Anthony Brueckner - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):295–301.
Conceptual Relativism.Fredrick Christopher Swoyer - 1976 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Conceptual relativism.Bruce Aune - 1987 - Philosophical Perspectives 1:269-288.
On Davidson's refutation of conceptual schemes and conceptual relativism.Xinli Wang - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):140-164.
Non-dualism versus Conceptual Relativism.P. Kügler - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):247-252.
Science and conceptual relativism.Joseph L. Esposito - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (4):269 - 277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
18 (#1,157,809)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references