Reply To Mike Chopra-Gant

Film-Philosophy 8 (3) (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mike Chopra-Gant 'Theorizing the Couple: On Nochimson's _Screen Couple Chemistry_' _Film-Philosophy_, vol. 8 no. 44, December 200

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3366/film.2004.0035

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Mogg and Chopra-Gant.Deborah Thomas - 2003 - Film-Philosophy 7 (1).
Theorizing the Couple, on Martha P. Nochimson's Screen Couple Chemistry: The Power of 2.Mike Chopra-Gant - 2004 - Film-Philosophy 8 (3).
Speaking and Writing about Godard: A Response to Nochimson and Sutton.David Sterritt - 2000 - Film-Philosophy 4 (1).
Vagaries of Taste, or How 'Popular' is Popular Culture?, a reply to Vittorio Frigerio.Richard Porton - 2003 - Film-Philosophy 7 (7).
A Reply to Kinsey.Edward S. Small - 2003 - Film-Philosophy 7 (7).
Phenomenology, History and the Image: A Reply to Kathleen Fitzpatrick.Josh Cohen - 1999 - Film-Philosophy 3 (1).
Last Things First: A Reply to Sutton.Garrett Stewart - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).
Rethinking Renoir, a reply to Michael Abecassis.Martin O'Shaughnessy - 2004 - Film-Philosophy 8 (1).
Reply to Bleasdale.Tag Gallagher - 2002 - Film-Philosophy 6 (3).
Reply to MacKinnon and Sorfa.Laura Mulvey - 2001 - Film-Philosophy 5 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
45 (#516,855)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references